Study finds scientists seen as credible but less so as experts
Researchers surveying more than 6,000 people in Britain and Sweden found scientists are generally seen as trustworthy, yet their expertise is questioned on certain topics. The results indicate that being an expert does not guarantee public credibility in debates.
By Standard Topic. AI-generated from the reporting listed under Coverage. Published . Updated .
This story is no longer being updated. It reflects reporting up to .
What happened
A study of more than 6,000 people in the U.K. and Sweden found scientists are regarded as credible overall, but their standing as experts is more disputed when they discuss certain issues.
Why it matters
The findings suggest that scientific expertise does not automatically bring greater credibility in public debates.
Timeline
- Oct 15, 10:40 AM ET: A study of more than 6,000 people in the U.K. and Sweden on scientific expertise and credibility is published.
- Oct 16, 2:16 PM ET: Commentary argues science should return to campaign policy discussions, citing majority support across the political spectrum for government research investment.
Coverage
- It’s time to bring back science in campaign policy discussions (Kenna McRae)
- Scientific expertise does not guarantee greater credibility in public debates, survey suggests (phys.org)
More from Science
- Citrini Research designs 211 proteins with Claude AI
- Researchers find two methods to break down PFAS chemicals
- International team measures early Universe helium with record precision
- British Academy launches report on universities' research funding future
- Researchers find previously unknown chicken immune cell population
- Daily blueberries linked to fewer depression symptoms in small study