artificial-intelligence

OpenAI's Navier-Stokes proof claim faces growing doubts from mathematicians

A new arXiv preprint reports that the formally verified Lean proof diverges from the natural-language argument OpenAI published. NYU mathematician Tristan Buckmaster, whose unpublished work may have been used, has also raised concerns.

By Standard Topic. AI-generated from the reporting listed under Coverage. Published . Updated .

This story is no longer being updated. It reflects reporting up to .

What happened

OpenAI's claim to have solved the Navier-Stokes problem, one of mathematics' famous open problems, is under scrutiny. A new arXiv paper says its Lean-verified proof does not match its natural-language version, and NYU mathematics professor Tristan Buckmaster has warned that OpenAI may have benefited from his unpublished research.

Timeline

  1. September: OpenAI makes its claim to have solved the Navier-Stokes problem.
  2. Oct 13, 2:29 PM ET: A new arXiv paper says OpenAI's Lean code and natural-language proof do not match.
  3. Oct 14, 5:08 PM ET: Tristan Buckmaster warns on Fox Business that OpenAI may have benefited from his unpublished research.

Coverage

More from artificial-intelligence

All artificial-intelligence news · artificial-intelligence story archive