Science

Scientists criticize Trump plan to alter NIH grant review process

Critics say the proposed peer-review changes would cut transparency and risk politicizing funding, and public comment on the rule appears to have closed early.

By Standard Topic. AI-generated from the reporting listed under Coverage. Published . Updated .

This story is no longer being updated. It reflects reporting up to .

What happened

The Trump administration has proposed a change to peer review of grants at the National Institutes of Health. Scientists say the change would reduce transparency and risk politicizing the review process. The NIH appears to have closed public comment on the rule ahead of schedule.

Why it matters

Critics warn the changes could cut future medical breakthroughs short, after federal research funding helped produce a cystic fibrosis treatment.

Timeline

  1. Oct 13, 3:50 PM ET: A researcher criticized the proposed change, saying it would reduce transparency and risk politicizing grant reviews.
  2. Oct 14, 2:00 PM ET: The NIH appeared to shut down public comments on the peer-review rule change ahead of schedule.
  3. Oct 14, 3:50 PM ET: Commentators said increased political control over NIH research funding had already led to major cuts and disruptions to lifesaving research.

Coverage

More from Science

All Science news · Science story archive