artificial-intelligence

Anthropic and OpenAI sought control over outside AI safety reviews

Two AI firms reportedly wanted significant say over what independent evaluators could publish, over concerns that findings might expose trade secrets.

By Standard Topic. AI-generated from the reporting listed under Coverage. Published . Updated .

This story is no longer being updated. It reflects reporting up to .

What happened

Anthropic and OpenAI have reportedly sought significant control over what outside evaluators can publish, according to people familiar with the discussions. The companies were concerned that findings could reveal trade secrets.

Why it matters

The terms under negotiation could shape what the public learns about AI risks. Researchers need access to unreleased systems, but company approval and redaction rules can limit what they tell the public.

Timeline

  1. Oct 5: Anthropic and OpenAI privately sought strict editorial authority over what outside reviewers could publish.
  2. Oct 13, 6:07 AM ET: Reuters reported that the two companies sought significant control over what outside evaluators could publish, citing concerns that findings could reveal trade secrets.
  3. Oct 14, 12:45 AM ET: The reported requests were described as contradicting September pledges from both CEOs that evaluators would work without company approval.

Coverage

More from artificial-intelligence

All artificial-intelligence news · artificial-intelligence story archive